Skip to content Skip to footer

Why our American history proves rioting is in our blood

Riots are a staple in American history.  Like them or not, there’s no denying this. Some riots support better causes than others, or at least are easier to understand.

But throughout U.S. history the American legacy of riots resurfaces, again and again. We can trace roots back as far as the Boston Tea Party. Don’t believe it? Then read on.

The Stamp Act Riots – 1765

This bit of history might sound familiar. British government proposing a tax on all stamps, and other printed goods? Check. Boycotting British imports? Check. The Declaratory Act? Check.

Unhappy with the heavy tax on all printed goods, colonists protested and destroyed the property of government officials that were tasked with executing the tax. The Stamp Act was so reviled, it was shut down one day after it went officially into effect.

The Stamp Act riots were the first among many that spurred forward the American Revolutionary war.


The Dorr Rebellion – 1841

Taking place in Rhode Island, this rebellion is a bit peculiar. There was only one death, and that was completely by accident. That sounds normal but the thing is, both sides here had armies…that just didn’t find each other.

Anyway, this whole thing was sparked by the fact that the people wanted a new Constitution, instead of the Royal Charter that Rhode Island was still clinging to, for some reason. There were calls to reform that were ignored, so… the people made another Constitution that everyone, including people who could vote, agreed to.

One setback: The old government didn’t exactly approve of this, so things got pretty dicey. Thus, there were two differing governors: Dorr for the new charter and King for the old one.

This protest finally led to a new Rhode Island Constitution in 1843…sort of. It didn’t exactly apply to some groups of people, like immigrants or those without property, so it left many of Dorr’s supporters still stuck in the same place, but the point is they got something done.


The Stonewall Riots 1969

Though it may just be my lack of historical knowledge, I cannot think of a more important event for LGBTQ+ history other than Stonewall.

After a police raid at the bar known as Stonewall Inn escalated into violence, people fought back. These riots became integral to the LGBTQ+ movement, thanks to some of its main actors, like Black Trans activist Marsha P.  Johnson, who threw the first brick at Stonewall.

Soon, organizations began popping up for gay rights and several newspapers were born. Gay Power was the first gay newspaper after the Stonewall Riots in 1969.  The Gay Blade, later renamed The Washington Blade also published its first issue on October 5, 1969.

Without the stonewall riots against police brutality, the state of queer rights in the U.S., and quite possibly the world would not be where it is today.


The L.A. Riots -1992

Does this sound familiar? After four cops were acquitted with no charges (except one minor charge of a mistrial) for beating Rodney King, people took to the streets to protest without hesitation.

King was arrested for leading the police on a highspeed car chase, while drunk. The beating that took place afterward by four cops, was videotaped and aired on TV soon after.

The riots also took place in part because of the lack of justice for the shooting of a 14-year-old Black girl, Latasha Harlins. Harlins was shot in the back of the head by Korean shop owner Soon Ja Du who thought the young girl was stealing. Harlins had the money for her purchase of orange juice in her hand.

The judge at the time Joyce Karlin sentenced Soon Ja Du to community service after she was convicted of 2nd-degree manslaughter. The verdict and sentencing which occurred right before the Rodney King trial, set up the catalyst for the LA riots.

This riot engaged much violence and looting, despite pleading from King himself and the president at the time denouncing the riots.

The result of the riots was the federal government’s promise that the LAPD would be reformed—this, as you could guess, took quite some time. It didn’t happen until in the early 2000s, actually.

The Department of Justice itself oversaw the LAPD transition, with increases in diversity and tech to keep track of misconduct. The DOJ left the LAPD to its’ own devices in 2013.

Reflecting on this, given the current state of things the question remains if police reform truly leads to lasting and effective justice.


What do these historical riots mean for us today?

It’s easier to dismiss riots as something purely unnecessary, childish, or even criminal. But this totally ignores why people usually riot.

For those of you who love to quote MLK’s non-violence rhetoric, peep what he said about riots:

“We’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard.”

People who are rioting, are usually rioting because they feel that they’ve been done wrong. That the system is wrong. Rioters are Americans who are fed up and angry.  I’m not condoning riots here, but if you write them off, you’ll never know why.

On John Oliver’s show Last Week Tonight Kimberly Jones explains in regards to looting:

“There’s a social contract we all have where if you steal or if I steal there’s an authority who comes in and they fix the situation. But the person who fixes the situation is killing us. So the social contract is broken!”

If you want further readings on riots in American History, go check out the Watts Riot, Mount Pleasant Riot, Zoot Suit Riots, and more.

However, you choose to resist, good luck out there.

Dear Universities: Stop pretending you were never racist

With BLM bubbling over on the surface, a lot of people are trying to show their support in various ways.

Big chain corporations like Starbucks are doing it in ways of social media posts (and then forbidding workers to wear anything with BLM on it right after) and others are doing it in the form of donations.

Some corporations and groups are more successful than others in this. In moments like these, hypocrisy can slip out (see: the NFL).

For sports teams, this kind of thing proposes an interesting challenge. Or at least, it seems to be, given that sports teams and universities often don’t want to come to terms with their past.

Or change it, either.

https://twitter.com/BrianKMetzger/status/1274857117560631297


The Height of Learning

However, some universities are still trying. Recently, University of Florida wrote an email to its students about new implementations to address racism.

Some of these changes included anti-bias training, grants for faculty on topics of racism, changing any racist names of the buildings, and getting rid of statues. Oh, and discontinuing the use of the Gator Bait chant.

That last one got a lot more attention than you may have expected.

https://twitter.com/strugglemade105/status/1273707214465896448

The term “Gator bait” is a snapshot of America’s horrific past.  During slavery and the 20th century, white hunters would use black babies as prey to lure alligators.

UF isn’t alone in this; FSU’s Seminole War Chant is still around. Still, though, this goes to show how racism has become ingrained in university culture.

It’s completely normalized.

UF is not the only university addressing its’ own racism, however. Marshall University stated that they were going to implement a Coalition for Anti-Racism and plan to hire a more diverse staff.

Thomas College wrote of its plans to implement a more diverse community and curriculum. It’s nice that at the very least, writing about their plans to address racism within their communities.

It would be ridiculous to try to ignore the roots of universities or pretend that racism has not seeped into and affects most aspects of university life. I mean, for crying out loud, NYU’s Bobst library is named after an Anti-Semitic.


Changing Your Racist Roots

Other universities are attempting to start a dialogue or at least post about Juneteenth. Columbia University sent out an email regarding Juneteenth and racial justice resources.

However, posts about universities are, not necessarily sufficient when it comes to things like this. Yet, these kinds of posts don’t do enough to acknowledge the history or dismantle the remnants that still remain on college campuses.

Possibly moving forward as Oxford University has with their #ITooAmOxford hashtag and account dedicated to highlighting minority students’ experiences they’ve had at the university might be the answer.

It’s not about pretending these things never happened. We can’t just write off these horrible things, nor should we. It doesn’t mean we have to keep them, either.

Of course, with that in mind, the question becomes what will be done versus what should be done. (and what will actually be done in the future.)

Is it a wrap for Taco Bell? A deeper look into the BLM incident

During the height of everything going on right now, businesses are trying to show their support and win over the public. Following suit in trying to show their respect for BLM, Taco Bell joined the wave.

On June 2, Taco Bell posted this up on Twitter:


Then Taco Bell fudged up

Except, like some other businesses, it seemed to be all talk and no show. On June 8, an ex-employee, Denzel Skinner, took to Facebook to drop a live video.

https://twitter.com/tyrone_brother/status/1271181182852612099?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1271181182852612099&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketwatch.com%2Fstory%2Fa-taco-bell-employee-was-fired-for-wearing-a-black-lives-matter-mask-now-some-people-are-boycotting-2020-06-18

In it, he explains that after working, a whopping eight years, he was fired…for wearing a Black Lives Matter face mask at Taco Bell in Youngstown, Ohio.

A lady, presumed to be the manager, even tells him during the video that he “cannot bring politics into the building.” Yeah.

The public reaction was definitely not on Taco Bell’s side on this one. Many people took to Twitter to express their dissatisfaction at the news and at Taco Bell in general.

https://twitter.com/zachviIla/status/1273572681863106560

Taco Bell is not the first company to get caught doing this. Actually, that would be Starbucks.

https://twitter.com/itzskyeuwu/status/1271629490670764032

After they got busted not allowing their employees to wear pins in support of BLM. Despite making multiple tweets about changing the discourse that pervades the issue.

Ya know, because it goes against their policy to have employees wearing anything inherently political or that could possibly incite violence. Apparently.

Of course, Starbucks released a statement, changing this policy afterward. In light of the backlash, employees are now able to wear whatever pins they would like, in support of BLM.

Corporations or not, there is something kinda sick about pretending to support human rights while people are getting shot up.

As Skinner said in his video, these issues should not be considered strictly political—how can three words be so political?

This issue isn’t just about the politics of resolution, it’s about people who, ideally, would like to stop dying or being fearful in front of people supposed to protect them.


And the number one performer Is…

Though Taco Bell released another statement about the issue to USA Today, stating they discussed this with Skinner afterward, it seemed to be a bit too late for that.

#RIPTACOBELL ended up trending on Twitter for a bit, as the controversy spread. I don’t think I have to explain WHY people don’t want to see this, especially from beloved places.

Thing is, places like Starbucks, Taco Bell, and Chik-Fil-A are not our friends—they’re corporations, with their number one motivator being profit, from YOUR wallet.

Performative acts like posts on social media are just not enough, and they shouldn’t be enough for you or your wallet, regardless of how much you like those frappes, or crunchy wraps (I don’t actually eat Taco Bell, ok, stop yelling at me,  now it’s a good thing).

These acts are truly performative in nature and do not do much to further the cause. And if we can’t get these corporations to care, we can at least make them pretend to, with our dollar.

Why the #BLM movement needs more from our government

With everything going on, there are a lot of questions coming to the surface about race and society. Though we aren’t quite ready to yet, people have been trying to answer the question of how to move forward. And I mean, it’s not an easy one.

There are campaigns like 8cantwait, a local grassroots campaign for defunding the police, Act Now JH, and a lot more.

The government, arguably, also seems to be trying to move past everything happening. “Breonna’s Law,” a law banning no-knock warrants has been unanimously passed in Louisville, Kentucky.  New York also just passed a bill making it a class C felony for a police officer to use a chokehold, for Eric Garner.

However, there’s just…

one…

thing…

You cannot have reconciliation without acknowledgment.

To move forward, justice needs to be dealt. Accountability needs to be in place. Without both, it’s like asking someone if you guys can be all good again after they stabbed you, without remorse.


Other countries fail to do this too

This isn’t something that only functions on an individual level, either. Even other countries have grappled with how to move forward after tragedies, some better than others.

In the 1970s, Spain enacted the “Pact of Forgetting”, a law that refuses to acknowledge the crimes committed during the dictatorship. It failed on a fundamental level because it did not provide any victim with support, nor charge any human rights violator.

Turkey does not acknowledge the Armenian Genocide. Argentina has never spoken out about the forced disappearances that occurred under their military dictatorship in the 1970s.

Acknowledgment can be hard. But the people wronged will never really forget. To this day, there are women in the Mother of the Plaza de Mayo who march for their disappeared children. Why? Because they want to be heard. They want those forced disappearances to be acknowledged. They want their government to be held accountable.


What tools have governments been using?

Of course, countries have succeeded in acknowledging crimes and offering justice. Still, though, what about on a national scale? How do we even start to have accountability? It’s beginning to look more and more like a whole other can of worms.

Even if we suspend our beliefs for a moment–just a moment, stick with me–and ignore the specific case of Breonna Taylor, is creating these laws enough? Will it prevent future deaths like hers and ensure accountability?

For that, let’s turn to NPR.

According to NPR,  the NYPD banned chokeholds in 1993, except when an officer’s life is in danger. The LAPD banned (a type) of a chokehold in 1982. Chicago did it in 2012.

But bans don’t work. If they did, Eric Garner would still be alive right now. But he’s not, and neither is Breonna Taylor or the hundreds of other victims. Garner’s death was ruled a homicide and none of the law enforcement officers involved were charged. Reform might not be the answer.

https://twitter.com/KultureHub/status/1273042644462075904?s=20


So…What Now?

What does it mean to name these laws after individuals if a solution is not being offered in their present cases? The fact that these bills are coming into play is not a bad thing. But to suggest to continue without charging these officers makes these bills not much more than a gesture.

How do we progress forward? We don’t until justice is met. If the system is broken, introducing more rules to that same system will not change it. Especially when the discretion of upholding those rules is up to the same bodies.

People want to feel safe and heard. If a random civilian committed a homicide, they would most likely be charged, right? Yet today, most police officers are not convicted for their fatal shootings.

This is not about guilt, this is about doing what is morally (and legally) right. In the field of human rights and reparations any forward change always requires acknowledgment by the perpetrators.

We want to move forward, right? Well, Breonna Taylor may have a law named after her, but as of today, her killers are still free.

There’s some food for thought.

 

Shake your tail feather to our 2020 Pride Month music playlist

Before we even get into our 2020 Pride month music playlist, we all know about the musical talents of Janelle Monae, Tyler the Creator and Frank Ocean.

Queer artists are breaking out to the mainstream left and right. But what about other up and coming queer Black and POC artists coming to the scene?

Here are some new artists to consider when filling up your own Pride 2020 playlist.

Anjimile

 

View this post on Instagram

 

🎶 if you think im sexy & you want my body stay 6 feet away from me 🎵 • 📷: @cinnamoncoffeecakee

A post shared by anjimile (@anjimile) on

Anjimile is a trans and queer Malawian-American raised in Texas. Anjimile’s music is cultivated by the many intersectional ties of their own life. Their music is raw, intimate, and almost somewhat quiet.

However, they employ different genres of music like indie-pop. Their song, “Sonja Smokes Me Out” represents that.


AlexTBH

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by alextbh (@alex.tbh) on

Considered Malaysia’s first queer pop star, AlexTBH is a 23-year old singer who sings of love and heartbreak. His latest release, “Between”, dropped May 15.

Alex’s songs are inspired by his own stories and intimate encounters with those in his life. Though his music is chipper and happy, the stories lurking beneath are complex.

He may actually be dropping new music this July, stay tuned.


CHIKA

 

View this post on Instagram

 

i’m so tired of being slept on 🥺@rollingstone 📸: @itstrotter

A post shared by CHIKA 🕹 (@chikalogy) on

CHIKA is an up-and-coming rapper, born in Montgomery, Alabama. You may have heard her voice on Jojo’s song, “Sabotage“. Maybe you recognize her from the awesome freestyle she did over Kanye’s “Jesus Walks” beat, where she talks about his support of Trump.

Her latest release, “Industry Games” dropped March 13. Tunes like “Songs About You” or “Balencies” are catchy bops to vibe out to.


Princess Nokia

 

View this post on Instagram

 

I am very proud of to share with you all my Wonderland Magazine Summer 2020 Cover. As an independent artist, large milestones in my career such as this are overwhelmingly beautiful. Sharing this didn’t feel right at the moment, but my team along with Wonderland have decided to make sure we use this opportunity wisely. @wonderland will be joining me in donating to @grassrootslaw, who are working tirelessly on reforming the American criminal justice system. I faced many privileges my entire life, it’s time I (and allies of the black community) use every moment we have at large to help make change. Enough is enough. Black Lives Matter. Creative Director: @robotmoonjuice Photography: Drew Reynolds Thank you @wonderland @tcbpublicrelations

A post shared by Princess Nokia (@princessnokia) on

Princess Nokia is a New-York born, Puerto Rican bisexual icon. Her songs, “Sugar Honey Iced Tea” and “I Like Him” blew up. Nokia incorporates rap and even emo-rap in her songs.

This year, her single, Gemini | A COLORS SHOW, is laid-back, with a lo-fi kind of atmosphere.


Shea Diamond

Shea Diamond is a trans woman singer with a hell of a story. She was born in Little Rock, Arkansas, and ran away from home at the age of fourteen. At age twenty, Shea was in and out of prison after robbing a convenience store to pay for gender reassignment surgery.

Diamond has written and performed songs to speak out against police brutality, along with her own story. Her songs “I Am Her” and “I Am America” are very powerful.


Brittany Howard

 

View this post on Instagram

 

Very thankful for the 2020 @americanafest nominations!🙏🏾

A post shared by Brittany Howard (@blackfootwhitefoot) on

You may have heard of Brittany Howard from her previous band, Alabama Shakes. Brittany Howard dropped her debut album, Jaime, just last year.

Brittany Howard is a proud Southerner from Alabama, and you can hear the influences of the South within her album. Her own experiences with racism can be found in songs like “Goat Head”.

Songs like “Stay High” show off her voice, incorporating high falsettos and soft twinkles. It offers an intimate atmosphere that is worth the listen.


Dua Saleh

Hailing from Minneapolis, Minnesota, Dua Saleh is a Muslim, Sudanese-American singer and activist. This June, they released an EP titled ROSETTA, which is ethereal and eclectic, something akin to a fantasy vibe.

Saleh incorporates vivid storytelling and combines different elements of rapping and singing to achieve a different feel. Songs like “windhymn” feel soft and enchanting. In the song “Smut,” they switch between Arabic and English.

Saleh has also used their music to speak out about issues such as police brutality, in the song “body cast.”

During an interview with Michelle Kim, Saleh was questioned about the title of the ROSETTA EP and its relationship to Sister Rosetta Tharpe.

Saleh responded, “How can I imagine queer love in a way that’s radical and that has profound complexity?”


Rina Sawayama

Rina Sawayama is a pansexual, Japanese-British singer and songwriter who is very versatile. With different styles like nu-metal and teen pop showing up on her tracks, she’s definitely changing the game. Songs like “XS” are reminiscent of the early 2000s pop, except with a rocking guitar riff throughout.

Her tracks don’t only include pop stylings but also her own grappling with her identity and sexuality. For example, take the song “Cherry”, where she talks about her pansexuality.


Taliwhoah

London born, L.A. based singer, Taliwhoah is not just one thing. Elements of her Caribbean heritage, slips of soul, and R&B can be found in her newest album, Another Dimension.

Her music is about what defines us and how increasingly complicated that can be. The song “Somebody” is a sultry mix of R&B and Afro-Caribbean soul.


Your 2020 Pride Month music playlist

Regardless if Pride month is what brought you here, hopefully, you’ll decide to stay. Check out the playlist at the bottom if you’re interested in hearing these artists (and more!) for yourself.

It’s clear that all of these artists are bringing something fresh to the table and are worth celebrating, year-round.

The Supreme Court’s big decision on DACA… may not be so big, after all

Thursday, June 18 was an important day for all Americans. The  Supreme court ruled 5-4 in a decision to allow DACA recipients to continue living and working in the United States, safely.

This came after much before it; in 2017, Trump rescinded DACA. But let’s slow down for a sec.

https://twitter.com/__benadryl/status/1273767520059699212


What is DACA?

DACA, which stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. It is a program that allows recipients to live here lawfully, and apply for work permits.

It does not have a current path toward citizenship. DACA is for people who arrived in the States as children, prior to the age of 16. They must live in the country continuously and cannot leave.

If they do leave the US for any reason whatsoever, DACA recipients are not guaranteed entry back in. There are a handful of other requirements, like: they must be in school, acquired their GED, or be an honorably discharged military member.

Also, they cannot be convicted of any crimes. DACA offers Dreamers two years of deferred deportation. Luckily, the two-year period is renewable.


Whoa, whoa, whoa…Dreamers?

Yes, recipients are called “Dreamers,” after the DREAM Act that was introduced into Congress originally in 2001. Here’s the thing though: The Dream Act, which would have offered some sort of way for a Dreamer to possibly become a citizen, has never passed.

And yes, DACA recipients pay their federal income taxes, despite not being allowed to vote, receive any federal benefits (like Social Security, college financial aid, or food stamps), and cannot receive a path to citizenship. (Luckily, some states have passed laws to offer Dreamers in-state tuition.) In fact, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the 1.3 million Dreamers pay an estimated 1.7 billion a year in taxes.

If all of this sounds stressful, it should. Without any way to even try becoming a citizen, Dreamers are effectively stuck in a limbo, constantly working to prove themselves before the end of those two years, to either buy time or get deported.

But at least Supreme Court’s ruling yesterday stops that, right?

https://twitter.com/Blue2020Rebekah/status/1273850030370234368


The Supreme Court’s big decision… May not be so big, after all

Though this decision buys time, it still has done nothing to guarantee Dreamers. In fact, the Supreme Court didn’t quite rule on the basis of DACA itself, but rather, the question of proper paperwork.

Roberts, the Supreme Court Judge who wrote the majority opinion, stated, “We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,” Roberts wrote.

“The wisdom of those decisions is none of our concern. Here we address only whether the Administration complied with the procedural requirements in the law that insist on ‘a reasoned explanation for its action.’ ”

This hints that in the future, and administration with a (somehow) more coherent reasoning could get by on Supreme Court and end DACA for all.  However, the current pandemic also may have helped to influence this outcome.

Around 27,000 Dreamers are on the frontlines during COVID-19, working in health care.

Yet, the fight for DACA is still not over. Thursday was an important day, but it could very well be a pause in the conversation instead of a pin. Ultimately, it is going to depend on what happens in the voting booths this November.

What’s the difference? Defunding vs. reforming law enforcement

If you’ve been even remotely alive on social media, you’ve probably seen these two phrases: reforming law enforcement and defunding law enforcement.

Here’s a quick guide to understanding what exactly each term means and what it entails.

Reforming law enforcement

Reforming is the stuff that’s kinda been happening. It’s about increasing the budget, instilling more rules such as body cams, anti-bias training, etc.

If you’ve heard of the ZeroCampaign, 8cantwait, then you’ve already heard of reforming. The 8cantwait campaign includes banning chokeholds, requiring de-escalation, and the duty to intervene.

Now, while all of these things should be instituted, the question of, “Is it enough? lingers. The city of Los Angeles meets five of these eight requirements.

Yeah.

That Los Angeles.

Human Rights Watch slammed 8cantwait, stating it proposes “minor and ineffectual changes.” Some of this is due to the fact that most of these changes are still under the same discretion as they were before.

The campaign promises that enacting all eight of these changes can eliminate police brutality by 72 percent.

Overall, reform is about keeping the current situation and adding to it in order to affect change. This also includes the idea of community policing, a tactic in which police are closer-knit to the community in which they, well, police.


Defunding law enforcement

The simple answer for defunding is exactly that—to take money away from the police funds. But before you start angrily writing letters, consider this: the operating budget for the NYPD is 5.6 billion dollars.

(Note that this does not include the overall funds NYC allocated to the PD, but a portion specifically for the operating budget. You can read more about it here.)

The argument here is that the money could be better spent in other sectors, such as housing and education. Defunding means removing money and putting it in areas that could help people avoid poverty and crime.

It also means re-investing those funds into marginalized communities via social services, hospitals, markets, etc. This way, there is less reliance and dependency on the police.

If policing continues as is, defunding is a way of combating the systemic racism that the current institution holds. One response to this argument has been about sexual violence. If police are not around to solve these cases and bring justice, then who will?

And yet…

It doesn’t quite look like…

No, it doesn’t look like that is the case here, at least according to experiences of the public.

Perhaps community members, such as social workers or mental health groups, would be better equipped to help survivors.


Abolish…and disband?

Defunding can also be coupled with abolishing the police altogether, although the two are separate. Abolishing the police altogether suggests instead strengthening and calling upon other first-responders for situations.

For example, having social workers and other members in the community itself handle some issues like overdoses, instead of cops.

Abolition is about decriminalizing and finding a new way altogether to help these communities.

Minneapolis has recently announced their plans to do just this via dismantling its police department completely. While there are no definitive announcements of what will take its place, it is a start.